[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: the kind of players I'm thinking of



I'm not so sure.  For teams with their eye on that special foreign player
or local hero, draft picks must be pretty attractive.  And what about
a team like the Wolves, that have no picks at all?  Still, I would keep
them too, at least until we see who we can get with them.  I just hope
they don't hire a Wayne Embry or someone who comes in and insists
on putting his stamp on the franchise, overrulling Papile and Wallace,
etc.  I hope whoever they hire is secure enough to let our scouts do
what they do best.

Josh Ozersky	
Marketing Communications Specialist 
Corning Museum of Glass

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hironaka [SMTP:j.hironaka@unesco.org]
> Sent:	Friday, March 16, 2001 9:56 AM
> To:	W
> Cc:	I am. . . Anonymous; 'celtics@igtc.com'
> Subject:	Re: the kind of players I'm thinking of
> 
> W wrote:
> 
> > >   I remember way back when the Knicks had THREE mid-level
> > > draft picks in one year.  They held onto them instead
> > > of trading, and if I remember correctly drafted
> > > McCarty and 2 other duds.
> >
> > Walter McCarty
> > Dontae' Jones
> > John Wallace
> >
> > W
> 
> Or consider the Orlando scenario of 1998.
> 
> 12. Michael Doleac
> 13. Keon Clark
> 15. Matt Harpring
> 
> The five players that went immediately ahead of Doleac were Jason
> Williams, Larry Hughes, "Sprockets" Nowitzki, Paul Pierce and Bonzi
> Wells. That's a playoff team right there practically.
> 
> At the time, I recall lamenting that the 1998 draft was only 8 or 9
> players deep, but luckily for Boston it turned out to be ten deep. The
> national Orlando sports pages actually had pencilled in Jason Williams
> to be the Magic's 12th or 13th pick, but Sacramento surprised everyone
> by "pulling another Bobby Hurley" and taking him at #7. Robert Traylor
> was the only thing resembling a bust in a solid top ten.
> 
> Boston right now has the rights to the 11th (Denver), 14th and 17th pick
> (Suns) I believe.
> 
> To look on the bright side for a minute, back in the1996 draft the 17th
> pick left you with the choice of Jermaine O'Neil, Jerome Williams,
> Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Derek Fisher or Walter McCarty (Doh!). The 14th pick
> was a good one (Sacramento's Predrag Stojakovic). At 11, one could
> choose between Kobe Bryant and Vitaly Potapenko (Doh!)
> 
> At the other end of the spectrum, last year's historically lame draft
> still offered a decent 14th pick in Mateen Cleaves and 17th pick in
> Desmond Mason (with Jake Tsakalidis lasting until #25). Of course the
> 11th pick in that draft (a French-boy from UCLA) apparently has the
> fewest minutes played on his mediocre team, despite enjoying an
> injury-free season.
> 
> In Pitino's first year, the other widely acknowledged draft wasteland of
> recent times, the 11th throught 14th picks featured two defensive
> standout guards in Derek Anderson and Tariq Wahad (Olivier St Jean)
> along with two big forwards in Austin Croshere and Mo Taylor.
> 
> If you look at the overall picture of 11th-17th picks in this decade, it
> is clear that Chris Wallace has his work cut out for him and needs to be
> putting in long days scouting at the prep, college and international
> level. Not to be too dramatic, but in a capped out situation Wallace
> kind of holds the key to Boston's future.
> 
> It probably depends where they eventually fall, but these three picks
> are unfortunately more valuable to actually use than to try to trade for
> an impact pick or player. I kind of doubt a bunch of draft picks in the
> teens will carry the trade value of a single top-ten pick, especially
> with the mediocre Orlando and Knicks drafts as a precedent somewhat
> fresh in most GM's minds. A later first round pick in the NBA holds
> approximately the same value as maybe a 5th round pick in the NFL draft.
> 
> 
> 
> ****
> 
> 
> 
> 
>