[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nazr

My understanding is that if the C's want Nazr, he could be had via free agency. I don't believe a trade would be necessary.


On 2 Jul 2001, at 17:03, kevin lok wrote:

> Trading for Nazr can be hazardous, based on experience with the
> Pot+pick for Andre Miller fiasco:
> 
> - we don't know how Nazr will perform with the Cs. Of course he played
> together with Walker/Waltah/OBie before, but this is a different
> situation. - Nazr only get to play the last month of his 3 year career
> so far. Would you sign him long term based on this? It's risky. - Nazr
> is 6-10, Pot is 6-10, is Nazr a upgrade over Pot (or Battie or
> Blount)? - can we risk losing our #1 pick next draft, where it is PG
> deep?
> 
> my wish is we stay put with our Pot-Blount-Battie center by committee.
> I can live with this till next Feb dateline.
> 
> kevin