Re: Why not Marc Jackson?

["John Lyell" <johnlyell@hotmail.com>]

I would consider a Battie for Jackson sign and trade.
Moiso for Jackson would have seemed feasible..




----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Metz" <JBMetzEA@AOL.com>
To: "Berry, Mark S" <berrym@BATTELLE.ORG>; "'j.hironaka'"
<j.hironaka@unesco.org>; <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: Why not Marc Jackson?


> on 8/3/01 3:03 PM, Berry, Mark  S at berrym@BATTELLE.ORG wrote:
>
> I know the Celts will use the luxury tax as an excuse (even though they
> could have used their mid-level exception and still most likely avoided
the
> tax). But how about a sign-and-trade?
>      **********
>    If Jackson wants at least the full exception and Golden State can't pay
> him that much, what good to him, is a sign and trade? G.S. has to sign him
> first and then make the trade. I think he has to wait for a team with the
> full exception, or a team under the cap, to sign him.
>    Joe is right about us using a part of the exception on Palacio, so I
> think that leaves us in a box regarding Jackson.
> -JB-
>
>
>
>
> Unchain My Heart!