RE: Pack/Cheaney for Herren/Stith?

[OzerskyJA <OzerskyJA@cmog.org>]

Well, I can see it from Denver's point of view.  Cheaney is more durable and
a better defender than Stith; also a solid citizen with no ego to speak of.
Pack is a proven commodity who, if healthy, could help them a lot.  Neither
Herren nor Stith are getting many minutes, for whatever reason.  I think
this trade could help both teams.  Do any of you out there know anything
about Herren + his game?  I read his bio, but of course what I really want
is a scouting report.  

Josh Ozersky	
Marketing Communications Specialist 
Corning Museum of Glass

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Berry, Mark  S [SMTP:berrym@BATTELLE.ORG]
> Sent:	Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:58 AM
> To:	'celtics@igtc.com'
> Subject:	Re: Pack/Cheaney for Herren/Stith?
> 
> The Celts must really like Herren. I don't see why Denver would do this
> deal. Let's face it, Pack is going to be injured. Cheaney is useless. What
> are the Nuggets getting out of this? I thought Issel loved Herren? If this
> is on the table, I don't see why the Celts would say no. Herren may be-and
> that's a big MAY-a point guard to develop for the future. Anyway, seems
> like
> a no-risk deal, because we could dump Pack and Cheaney for nothing and not
> really notice.
> 
> The encouraging thing in all this talk of Herren, Stoudamire, Pack and
> Brown, is the fact that Pitino seems to realize what most of us also
> see-Kenny isn't the answer. Maybe something big is brewing with Kenny.
> Wouldn't that be nice?
> 
> Mark