RE: No banger necessary

["Michael Griffin" <mgriffin@rillc.com>]

John, I have the good (bad?) fortune of listening to Hacksaw on my drive
home from work every day in San Diego.  I don't see why Denver would want
Rice over Lafrentz.  One is going uphill and the other downhill.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-celtics@igtc.com [mailto:owner-celtics@igtc.com]On Behalf Of
> John Lyell
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:28 PM
> To: Way Of The Ray
> Cc: celtics@igtc.com
> Subject: Re: No banger necessary
>
>
> I think the Lakers are still concerned especially with what Portland has
> added in Kemp & Davis.
>  I heard Lee Hamilton on the mighty 690 keep mentioning a possible Laker
> Denver deal involving Rice and possibly Lafrentz and another team..
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Way Of The Ray" <wayray@ix.netcom.com>
> Cc: <celtics@igtc.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 12:00 PM
> Subject: Re: No banger necessary
>
>
> > That's easy to say, when you've got a skilled guy the size of a
> city block
> manning the middle.
> > Ray
> >
> > DJessen33@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > A couple of interesting comments in the following link. First that
> players feel it is better to not have the coach also be the GM.
> Second that
> West didn't feel a banger power forward is necessary anymore with the rule
> changes. Hey, that is pretty much where we are at(no banger other than
> VP)!...
> > >
> > > http://www.foxsports.com/columns/stories/bk0905swd_lazenby1.sml
> > >
> > > DJessen33
> >
> >
>