Re: Bird

[W <titans@ihug.com.au>]

Personally,

If I had the choice of having a Paul Allen-type owner and basketball people type owners, I'd choose Allen every time. Why? Who has the money? What has the NBA become? Its become a "You're screwed if you do and you're screwed if you dont".

W

Juddy wrote:

> My answer, Douglas, is that with Bird and his associates as owners the Celts would be owned by basketball people, not a money man.  That's a big deal.  The second is that they'd have an NBA coach - and for what it's worth, I think that's what they need.  Sure, they need some changes in personnel on the floor, but I think a new coach might make a big difference in performance of the ones there now.
> Dorine