[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: that's it?

To: Celtics@igtc.com (Celtics Email List)
Subject: Re: that's it?
From: Jim McMaster <mcmaster@sweng.stortek.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:57:41 -0700
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2000 06:15:52 +1100." <38A30E68.1BC8C358@ihug.com.au>
Sender: owner-celtics@igtc.com

In message <38A30E68.1BC8C358@ihug.com.au>, W said:

> As far as Alvin Williams, I cannot believe that some of you who were praising
> him previously haven't given him a chance now that we've got him. Lets wait
> and see what the guy can do. At minimum, we've got ourselves a 6'5" point
> guard with defensive intangibles that we were lacking before which has now
> made our previous backup point guard, Dana Barros expendable with a year
> remaining on his contract.
> 
Personally, I never praised Alvin Williams.  He is not "a 6'5" point
> guard with defensive intangibles."  He is a tall, athletic player who does not pass, shoot or defend well.  In other words, a typical NBA athlete who does not know how to play basketball.

I just keep getting myself more depressed about this team and league...
-- 
Jim McMaster
mailto:mcmaster@sweng.stortek.com
Go Celtics!

References:
- Re: that's it?
  - From: W <titans@ihug.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Eric Williams
Next by Date: Re: On Bird & Pitino
Prev by thread: Re: that's it?
Next by thread: Re: that's it?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread