[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wolves game



My vote goes to trading Pierce with Battie/Pots/Pitino's first born, to the
Mavs for Finley. Finley is exercising his out clause in his contract at year
end, and it is in doubt whether he'll re-sign with the team. Offensively,
Finley and Pierce have a similar game, with Finley showing he can give up
the ball when he has to. Defensively, however, Finley wins hands down always
picking up the oppositions' best SG or SF.

Doubt the Mavs would go for it unless they are mighty desperate though. For
the record....I've not been the greatest of Pierce's fans. I prefer
Antoine's game, when he's prepared to give up the ball. Something about
psuedo point-forwards I like (ie; Mason).

Just a random thought on a dreary London afternoon.

Simon
______________________________

Ulcerate - Dark Alternative project
listen in at http://mp3.com/ulcerate
----- Original Message -----
From: <DJessen33@aol.com>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 2:52 PM
Subject: Wolves game


> We didn't get robbed by the refs. However, we didn't get the hometown
calls.
> It seems the refs only will give you hometown calls when visiting team
isn't
> clearly superior on paper....Do we really have a long term hope with the
lack
> of defense from Walker and Pierce? Battie is showing that he is a real
> player. So your long term guys are Walker, Pierce and Battie. But I just
> can't see these three together long term because of the lack of defense...
It
> appears that it is going to be a throw away year. I wish that Pitino could
> give Moiso some time in that case. Moiso might show some incentive if he
> actually got to play a little. The big guys take longer to
develop...Billups
> has seemed to find his niche. He was always a solid defensive player and
> could take the blow and make the shot. He could always shoot the free
throws.
> But he is now shooting from the floor better. He also isn't playing point
> guard. As we look back on the trade and the Pitino years, it appears that
the
> goal wasn't long term but short term. We always had to get good really
fast
> to keep the Pitino legacy in place. We have made some decisions (Anderson,
> VP) because of that. Now when we are still where we were before those
trades,
> it looks like we should have looking long term...
>
> DJessen33
>
> DJessen33
>
>