[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ron Mercer -Reply
Jim,
You make very good points here. I've assumed in the calculations that
every two free throws resulted from a missed shot attempt when players
are fouled. As you mention, this doesn't take into account three-point
plays ("and one"); it also doesn't take into account non-shooting fouls
when the fouling team is in a penalty situation. It's certainly not as
good as watching video and tabulating the results, but it's much better
than the typical measure of FG%.
And when you're comparing Walker and Mercer, I think Walker is the
one penalized from omitting three point plays. Mercer probably gets
more non-shooting fouls in late game situations because he is a much
better free throw shooter.
Alex
> >From: Alex Wang <awang@mit.edu>
>
> >For instance, say a guy is a great inside scorer and is wonderful at
> >getting inside position; as a result, opponents foul rather than give him a
> >dunk. His line may be something like 2-6 FG, 12-12 FT. If they give him the
> >dunk instead, his line is 8-12 FG, 0-0 FT. In each case he gets 16 points
> >on 12 possessions, which is an efficient performance. But his FG% is 33% in
> >the first case and 67% in the second.
>
> How do you measure possessions in a case like this? Since missed shots
> aren't counted as attempts when the player is fouled, aren't those
> possessions missing from the stats sheet? And, to complicate matters, you
> can't tell from the free throw attempts either, because some of those will
> be one shot after a made basket. To be meaningful, I think this stat would
> have to count shot attempts, including those he's fouled on, which you do in
> the example. I just don't see how you can get that stat in real life.
> Working from the line score you gave as an example, your player might have
> had 11 or even 10 possessions, not 12,which would affect his efficiency
> significantly.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com