Re: Jim O'Brien

[Dan Forant <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>]

We are getting thoughts from all angles now in this mail group. Nothing
like Democracy and differences of opinion. It's healthy. Open the windows
and let the air in. Debate.

At 11:54 AM 12/4/99 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 12/4/99 11:43:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
>mdynon@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
><< P.S.  Someone recently asked whatever happened to list member Kim Malo?
> Perhaps she just grew tired of the rampant negativity on this list. Case
> in point: after last night's satisfying, crucial, payback win over the
> top team in the conference, this morning's posts express no joy in
> victory. That's so predictable, and so regrettable.
>   >>
>Just wait!  The "we only beat them because Hardaway was out" posts are on
the 
>"way".
>
>Let's see:  we won "in spite of AW", "because Ricky got tossed", "because 
>Barros only played 13 minutes", "because McCarty never got off the bench".
>
>We did not win because Pierce went wild with 9 steals, Battie & VP had great 
>games, or Kenny shot the lights out.  Maybe that's because Pitino drafted 
>Pierce and traded for Battie, VP, and Anderson?  But then drafting Pierce
was 
>a "no-brainer" even tho he was passed over by 9 other GMs.
>
>George
>
>