[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Worse living through chemistry



John:

Is it just me, or are the Celtics playing much better without Kenny
Anderson?

John Lyell wrote:
> 
> Chemistry is the key to success. Although the Celctics are a good example
> of poor chemistry, the Lakers are even a better one. They have a lot more
> depth than the C's and just can fit the right pieces together, and the Rice
> deal did not seem to help.
> 
> On Saturday, April 17, 1999 5:35 PM, R. Bentz Kirby [SMTP:bocelts@usit.net]
> wrote:
> > In this ESPN article, the Celtics are picked to be an example of "bad"
> > team chemistry.  Good players who don't play well together.
> >
> > http://espn.go.com/nba/programming/saturday/990417.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bentz
> > bocelts@usit.net
> >
> > http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw
> >

-- 
Bentz
bocelts@usit.net

http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw