No Subject

["Jim Meninno" <jim_meninno@hotmail.com>]

No.  Where there's smoke, there's smoke.  Let's face it.  There have 
been trade rumors surrounding every member of the team over the last 
year and 99% of them have been wrong.  Sure, many of them may have even 
been something that the teams were considering, but that doesn't mean 
it's going to happen.  I know you don't make this stuff up (so don't 
have a hissy fit), but passing along every rumor you hear from whatever 
the source, isn't much more reliable.  Hey, I'm always interested to 
hear what rumors you have, because they do indicate what the team is 
thinking.  I usually figure about 1 in 50 will actually happen.  All 
this Walker stuff tells me is that the Celtics need to know what they 
can get for him if he won't sign with them.  Seems pretty sensible to 
me.

Jim

>From: "Witch Craft" <witchcraft1998@hotmail.com>
>To: hartleyo@ix.netcom.com, celtics@igtc.com
>Subject: Re: Walker Hater definition
>Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 11:21:49 PDT
>
>I would suggest you're all too familiar with Prozac :), if you don't
>consider Pippen and Kidd as equals of Walker.  In fact, they are 
better, 
>because they actually play defense.  For all his foibles,
>Sprewell is a massive talent, and if Indiana gets him, they will
>be much closer to winning a championship.  As far as trade rumours go,
>where there's smoke, there's fire.  Witness all the trade talk 
>concerning Billups, before he was dealt.  When a club starts offering 
>their players around the league, like the C's did with Chauncey and 
>recently (pre-draft) with Walker, rumours are generated.  
>WC
>Don't shoot me, I'm only the messenger.


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com