[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: If he wore green and white?
On Sat, 30 May 1998 17:11:10 -0400, Bentz wrote:
>I would say that Jordan is in the class with Russell, Chamberlain, Bird, Magic,
>Kareem. I am not sure that anyone else is in that class. But to say Jordan is
>the best. Well, I just can't buy that no matter who he played for. The league
>talent is watered down from the old days. The shooting skills have diminished as
>the athletic dunking has increased. I am not convinced that this Bulls team
>could beat the great Celtic team of the 50's if those players came along today
>and developed the same skills. Unfortunately, they would not develope the same
>skills. They would play today's game. So, as we know it is all hypothetical.
This is a little bit thick. The Russell Celtics were not a good
shooting team, measured by the standards of the time, or compared to
todays teams.
Year FG% Rank Avg FG%
56-57 .383 3 .380
57-58 .387 3 .383
58-59 .395 4 .395
59-60 .417 3 .410
60-61 .398 8(last) .415
61-62 .423 5 .423
62-63 .427 9(last) .441
63-64 .413 9(last) .433
64-65 .414 8 .426
65-66 .417 8 .433
66-67 .447 4 .441
67-68 .440 7 .445
68-69 .431 9 .441
Bentz's claims about shooting skills are somewhat exagerated.
Despite there being no reward for shooting long jumpers, the FG% in
the 60's were lower than today's (FG% today, would probably be close
to 50%, were it not for the 3 point shot). And the Celts were clearly
the worst shooting great team ever (all three of the years they
finished last in the league in FG%, they won more than 70% of their
games, and of course, won the title).
Interestingly, there doesn't seem to be much of a correlation between
expansion and FG% (and, if anything, it's positive). By 1968-69, the
league was up to 13 teams (from 8 in the early 60's), and the league
had also lost a substantial number of players to the ABA, but FG% were
at their highest level ever.
Bill Cooper
P.S. As for dunking goes, if it leads to higher FG% is IS a shooting
skill.