Re: PACERS

[bocelts@scsn.net (R. Bentz Kirby)]

I agree with this sentiment.  That is why I was posting the links to the
whiners who are already telling the officials, "We are the Bulls, you have
to give us the calls."  I would suspect that they would win.  Larry Bird has
done a good job coaching in this series.  In Game 5, there wasn't much he
could do to make them win.

I think the Bulls look like the tired Celtics of '87 and '88 and the Lakers
in their last final.  Unless Utah forgets how to play, they ought to win.
But, Indiana might beat Utah.

Dorine Pratt wrote:

> My question is, can the Pacers play that well in Chicago?  The thing
> that occurs to me watching the games is that in each game the Pacers
> have had one star who didn't produce much and still they won at
> Indiana.  If everyone on the Pacers can have a good game on Sunday, they
> can beat the Bulls.  I've said all year the Bulls were vulnerable.  I
> think it's obvious in this series.  If the Pacers can't quite get it
> done, Utah certainly should be able to.  I've often wondered if the long
> layoff, such as Utah has had, hurts or helps.  I don't really care that
> much which team beats Chicago for the championship, I just hope one of
> them does!
>     I saw that play where Michael fell down, too, and there's no way he
> was fouled, he just slipped.  He was not pushed.
> Dorine



--

Peace,

Bentz
bocelts@scsn.net
http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw