Re: Celts Bucks 95-104

[Cecil Wright <nocw1@nsh.library.ns.ca>]

Right on the money, Greg!!!

Cecil

On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Greg Odegaard wrote:

> Oh considering the depth of knowledge and attention to detail on this list
> we all probably noticed your obvious mistake, just after the trouble with
> one of your last posts, we didn't want to get into some silly name calling
> contest over this trivial issue.  BTW at least 2 people posted this error. 
> 
> 
> ----------
> > From: Dan <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
> > To: celtics@igtc.COM
> > Subject: Re: Celts Bucks 95-104
> > Date: Friday, January 23, 1998 7:01 AM
> > 
> > Just checking whose observant! Only one so far, not good.
> > 
> > >Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:27:17 -0500
> > >From: jmc@ptc.com (Jonathan McIntyre)
> > >Subject: Re: Celts Bucks 95-104
> > >
> > >Dan said:
> > >>    Listened to the game on the Bucks radio station and the announcers
> had
> > >> nothing but praise for the Celts and Pitino, stating the Celts play a
> > >> frenzied pace, with a great deal of nerve and savy, and that the Celts
> will
> > >> be a great team. Never heard such gushing from opposing announcers. 
> Thomas
> > >> got the start. Dee Brown played well the first half hitting the go
> ahead
> > >> score (3) at end of 1st quarter. Walker very cold shooting early made
> up
> > >> for it in 2nd quarter. The Bucks in 6th place in the Western
> Conference are
> > >> not a team to take lightly, think they won 6 in a row and are getting
> > >> plenty of home support with sellouts. With the shooting percentage way
> down
> > >> in half for both teams, it's hard to say if defense was even that
> > important. 
> > >> 
> > >>    Buck announcers said Celt management won't break the bank for
> Walker,
> > >
> > >Hmm, that's interesting.  The Celtics team that I was watching played an
> 
> > >identical game to the one you described, right down to the final score, 
> > >but they were playing the Minnesota Timberwolves instead.  
> > >
> > >Maybe the Bucks announcers got on the wrong flight.  ;-)
> > >
> > >Jon Mc
> > >
> > >
>