Re: Jackson Sensation

["JLyell" <jlyell@concentric.net>]

As far as I am concerned we don't have any 2 guards with any where near the
talent of Stackhouse.  Yes he does make a lot of turnovers but he is still
young.  I would swap Minor & Williams for Stackhouse any day.
- ----------
> From: Chris Mathew <cmathew@nw.tassie.net.au>
> To: celtics@igtc.com
> Subject: Re: Jackson Sensation
> Date: Thursday, May 01, 1997 12:15 AM
> 
> Christiaan wrote:
> > 
> > i think that the sixers will soon realize that it is nearly impossible
for
> > the shot-dependent iverson and stack to coexist peacefully and
beneficially
> > in their backcourt, and since iverson has just won ROY (according to
> > espnet), i cant imagine theyll get rid of him. thus, its sayonara
jerry. he
> > would definitely bring some excitement to the celtics, but dont they
have a
> > backlog in the backcourt anyway? im not positive how tall stack is
anyway,
> > but isnt he too short to play sf against the likes of horry , lj,
mashburn,
> > and pippen? plus, isnt antoine walker the sf of the future in boston? i
> > wonder whether whatever it was that the c's would have to give up for
stack
> > would really be worth it...
> > 
> > no clue on this jackson fella.
> > 
> > At 09:52 AM 4/30/97 -0800, Tim Nault wrote:
> > >has anyone heard about Stackhouse being traded?  I heard on the
> > >rumor mill that Philly was looking to trade him.  Perhaps we could
pick him
> > >up.  He does get a lot of turnovers, but other then that I can see no
real
> > >problems.  I have had the opportunity of watching him play live once
and I
> > >have seen him on tv, and he appears to be a pretty good ballplayer.
> > >Especially last year when he practically was the 76ers.  This year
Iversen
> > >has come in though and Stackhouse hasn't gotten the ball nearly as
much
> > >though.
> 
> 
> Stackhouse is mainly a 6'6" two guard.
> 
> Chris Mathew
> cmathew@nw.tassie.net.au
>