Re: Jackson Sensation

[Chris Mathew <cmathew@nw.tassie.net.au>]

Christiaan wrote:
> 
> i think that the sixers will soon realize that it is nearly impossible for
> the shot-dependent iverson and stack to coexist peacefully and beneficially
> in their backcourt, and since iverson has just won ROY (according to
> espnet), i cant imagine theyll get rid of him. thus, its sayonara jerry. he
> would definitely bring some excitement to the celtics, but dont they have a
> backlog in the backcourt anyway? im not positive how tall stack is anyway,
> but isnt he too short to play sf against the likes of horry , lj, mashburn,
> and pippen? plus, isnt antoine walker the sf of the future in boston? i
> wonder whether whatever it was that the c's would have to give up for stack
> would really be worth it...
> 
> no clue on this jackson fella.
> 
> At 09:52 AM 4/30/97 -0800, Tim Nault wrote:
> >has anyone heard about Stackhouse being traded?  I heard on the
> >rumor mill that Philly was looking to trade him.  Perhaps we could pick him
> >up.  He does get a lot of turnovers, but other then that I can see no real
> >problems.  I have had the opportunity of watching him play live once and I
> >have seen him on tv, and he appears to be a pretty good ballplayer.
> >Especially last year when he practically was the 76ers.  This year Iversen
> >has come in though and Stackhouse hasn't gotten the ball nearly as much
> >though.


Stackhouse is mainly a 6'6" two guard.

Chris Mathew
cmathew@nw.tassie.net.au