Re: Jackson Sensation

[Christiaan <christiaan.vorkink@yale.edu>]

i think that the sixers will soon realize that it is nearly impossible for
the shot-dependent iverson and stack to coexist peacefully and beneficially
in their backcourt, and since iverson has just won ROY (according to
espnet), i cant imagine theyll get rid of him. thus, its sayonara jerry. he
would definitely bring some excitement to the celtics, but dont they have a
backlog in the backcourt anyway? im not positive how tall stack is anyway,
but isnt he too short to play sf against the likes of horry , lj, mashburn,
and pippen? plus, isnt antoine walker the sf of the future in boston? i
wonder whether whatever it was that the c's would have to give up for stack
would really be worth it...

no clue on this jackson fella. 

At 09:52 AM 4/30/97 -0800, Tim Nault wrote:
>has anyone heard about Stackhouse being traded?  I heard on the
>rumor mill that Philly was looking to trade him.  Perhaps we could pick him
>up.  He does get a lot of turnovers, but other then that I can see no real
>problems.  I have had the opportunity of watching him play live once and I
>have seen him on tv, and he appears to be a pretty good ballplayer.
>Especially last year when he practically was the 76ers.  This year Iversen
>has come in though and Stackhouse hasn't gotten the ball nearly as much
>though.