[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adrian Woolridge
- Subject: Re: Adrian Woolridge
- From: RAMANI_R@bentley.edu
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 17:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
>I think Bagley might have spanned the Tom Davis and
>Gary Williams regimes at BC. Woolridge reminds
>me so much of Bagley, it isn't funny. Built the
>same with a lot of the same types of moves. I
>would stay away. We really need a 2 more than a 1
>IMO. I would go for size (4 or 5) and then a 2.
At the current situation, Walker although playing center now seems to be
developing for a 4 position. I agree that we need a 5 too, but for Wesley to
play 40-45 minutes per game is not good for him. I do recall someone suggesting
that we go for a 1 using one of our 1st round picks, i.e. Jacques Vaughn. I am
against that because sustained an injury on his hand and seems passive in
penetrating inside to open up shooters. Wesley is the man for us but I think
with his foot injury he sustained, he shouldn't be playing 40-45 minutes. That
is why I suggested Adrian Woolridge as a second rounder to back up Wesley. I
never seen Bagley play so I can't say much but instead how about a CBAer NOW
to easy Wesley playing time??
Anyone in the CBA??
Ritesh Ramani
ramani_rite@bentley.edu