Re: re-Trades ?

[Fung Yee Danny Lim <dlim@utkux.utcc.utk.edu>]

You know Dan, I think what Cheryl meant by the comment about Ewing and the
Knicks was that the Knicks should be a better team in the long run without
Ewing, as it would allow the other players to step up and take charge
without fear of taking Ewing's shots. Then, when Ewing returns, it should
make for a more cohesive and cofident team. There is something to be said
for a team when they believe that they can win without their star. - Danny

On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Dan wrote:

> Mercer is a keeper for sure. He has great scoring ability along with
> tremendous elevation. Side note: For those who thought the Knicks would be
> better off without Ewing, I noticed the Knicks lost to Toronto without
> Ewing. This particular team will never be better without him. They weren't
> going anywhere with him either. They need a coaching change badly. It was a
> mistake letting Van Gundy take this team over. Back to the subject, the
> keepers should be Walker, Mercer, Billups. San Antonio gave us a licken but
> we'll keep on ticken. 
> 
>