RE: Spree(not)well cut

[Charles Jowett <jowett_charles@waters.com>]

>>Why is it not a good business deal?  His trade value is squat, and with his
>>contract terminated, they have millions to work under the cap.

>If someone picks him up and pays him the minimum salary the warriors are 
>left paying the remainder of his 8 mil dollar salary. >I'm not quite clear on how 
>waivers affects this though.

The Warriors did not WAIVE Spreewell, they TERMINATED his contract.  Only 
two other players have had their contracts terminated, both for failing the NBA's 
drug policy.  As he was terminated, the Warriors do not have to pay him a penny.

Charles