[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
garnett
Everyone bashing Garnett is missing the point. He was
involved in negotiations. He didn't accept the team's first
offer -- albeit a huge offer. That isn't being greedy, it's
being shrewd. When a person enters into negotiations, he
does so with the assumption that the first offer he receives
is not going to be the best offer -- and that his first
counteroffer is not going to be his final counteroffer. So
Garnett turned down $102 mill and said he wants $132 mill.
The truth is, he is negotiating for something in between.
It's called good business. Remember, he will get paid what
the market demands -- but he doesn't control that market. If
a team is willing to pay $132 mill for Garnett, why should
he sell himself short.
If you have a problem with that, then you should fault the
NBA and players association for the system that allows
players to become free agents after three seasons. Remember,
this system was instituted to control rookie salaries, which
everyone agreed at the time were getting out of hand. Well,
in return, the league agreed to allow all rookies to sign
slotted contracts, but only for three years. So now all
rookies can become free agents after three years. Garnett
and the rest of his class (Joe Smith, Antonio McDyess, Damon
Stoudamire) are just the first to take advantage of it.
And in Garnett's case, the owner was out of line for making
the negotiaitons public. He would have cried foul if the
player or agent did that. All he has done is alienate his
best player and possibly turn the fans against the
franchise's most popular player. That was an inexcusable
mistake. Negotiations should be kept private until an
agreement is reached.
Is Garnett worth $132 million? No. Will he get it, or
something close, either from Minnesota or someone else
(Phoenix or Chicago)? Absolutely.
Mark