Re: noncewatch

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I think you do them a very generous favour. It's people like these who 
> attacked a peadiatrician's home because they thought she (I kid you not, 
> she) was a child molester - you know, it's so obvious isn't it, they're all 
> the same ..... peadophile, peadiatrician....... no difference.

I suspected this might be that group.  However, they've been polite in 
private emails--moreso than some Whofans, actually.


> Unfortunately Lela the real people you get down to are essentially anti 
> semitic, racist, homophobic nazis.

But unfortunately, we sometimes have to deal with anti-semitic, racist 
homophobic nazis.


> > > Also, I think their comments against child molesters are sincere.
>
> I'd disagree. I think they are a cynical exploitation of a tragic 
> circumstance in order to gain sympathy for their extremist views.

Perhaps you're right, but they did show up on one of the Who lists a couple 
of days after Pete was cleared, making ugly statements about him, and etc.  
I don't think they'd have bothered if they weren't really interested in the 
case.  Also, I'm going by a couple of statements in private emails.

As I mentioned above, we have to deal with them in some way, because they 
have appeared on Who fan lists.  It's possible they're not that interested 
in Pete, as you say, and that they will go off and leave us alone if we 
ignore them, but since we're in contact, I'd prefer to try to influence 
them.  The Whofans aren't push-overs on this issue--we're not operating on 
blind faith; we're armed with facts and dates and articles Pete published 
before his arrest.  Even if they refuse to consider what we say now, we've 
planted seeds of doubt that might save Pete some trouble later on.


keets

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail