Re: IWF

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > This looks to be the standard Catch-22 with the anti-child porn 
> sites--not just IWF.  They post all sorts of web addresses and phone 
> numbers to report child porn, but then remind you it's illegal to look at 
> it.
>
> So what's the point? What is the incentive to do the job right?  Sounds
> Government funded.  They get their paycheck anyhow.
Right, or else bleeding hearts with no real plan.  That's why I was 
wondering about the stats on IWF.  They do tell about their accomplishments 
in their annual report, and if it's to be believed, they do track down or 
pass along alerts about child porn to the police.  But whatever they do, 
it's not making much of a dent in the mass of child porn sites.  It's time 
for a new strategy.

keets

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail