betrayal and intimidation

["O'Neal, Kevin W." <Kevin.ONeal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	>Subject: betrayal and intimidation 
	>From: "Jeff House" 
>Mark Leaman said:  "You're dealing with issues, that's clear enough, and
>projecting me into the role of the person you have the issue with. I can
see
>that as clearly as I can see this screen. And BTW as long as you're in
>denial, you'll never feel better....so you can play out your little fantasy
>of facing up to someone in your past...You're projecting, trying to avoid
>dealing with your problem. Role playing..."
>
>Kevin O'Neal (in VT) and Mark,
>
>You win.  That was some fine teamwork.

What the fuck?
You're going to drag *me* into this stupid thing now?
Let's be clear here Jeff-ro, this is between *you* and *Mark*.

I have no idea where you're getting this "teamwork" thing, but you're way,
*WAY* off the mark there buddy.
My *reply* to you Monday off list was honest (more clarity....you approached
me!).  It's how I see this argument.  I'm sorry if my view doesn't mesh with
yours.  I suspect I'm not the only one.  Deal with it.  

I'll say this for Mark, that I can't say for you now:  Mark has never tried
to sway my opinion to one side or the other.

By posting the above, you really have sunk to a new low.
How this pertains to the list is beyond me.  But what *is* obvious, is
you're trying to use the list to sway opinion.
I want no part of it.
Leave...me...the...fuck...out of this insanity that *you've* created.

Lastly, I'll say here that *you* could have avoided this *whole* thing by
simply taking my advise (weeks ago) and picking up the phone and calling
Mark, and treating him like the friend he once was.

But, I guess that's not your nature.
Lashing out at people who don't agree with you seems to be a more accurate
reflection.
Kevin in VT