[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rudeness



Hey folk's, let's stop getting so personal!


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-thewho@igtc.com [mailto:owner-thewho@igtc.com]On Behalf Of
O'Neal, Kevin W.
Sent: 05 September 2001 17:53
To: 'TheWho@igtc.com'
Subject: RE: Fish Hooks and Beatles


>From: "Nigel Morton" <nigel@adastey.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: RE: Janet Reno vs. John Entwistle
>
>EErrrrrrr, 'scuse me but look at the photo more carefully, and read the
>article beside it!  She's not intending to eliminate John Entwhistle Band
>she's aiming to eliminate Gov. Jeb Bush!
>
>From: Quad <quadimages@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: Janet Reno vs. John Entwistle
>
>Surely you gest right?
>
>This is JEB as in Governor Jeb.

Do you two need any help getting the fish hooks out of your mouths?
Oooop, I mean the hooks, lines *AND* sinkers????
Jeff's silly, but he's not stupid.

>From: Andreas J Athans <ajathans@cisunix.unh.edu>
>Subject: Re: Beatles/Who looked at objectively
>
>You do realizer your entire "objective" look at the Beatle and Who is
>colored by your Who fanaticism and obvious dislike of The BEatles.  Two
>different bands, two VERY IMPORTANT bands.  No way around it.

Thank god! Someone had to say it!
Find it difficult to listen to someone who hasn't even listened to Revolver
rant against the Beatles.  The Beatles had an edge.  It was more psychedelic
than the pill-popping anger edge of The Who.
I'd like to hear someone argue against this statement:
The Beatles were more *important* to society than any other band before or
after.
The Beatles were/are number 1.  Always were, and always will be.  If that
ever changes, it means we are seeing a major social event.

>ANd I've
>said it before and I'll say it again, as much of a HUGE Who fan I am, if
>there were never The Beatles, there'd never have been a Who.

Awe shite, let the debate continue.

Kevin in VT