[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: zak vs ringo

To: thewho@igtc.com
Subject: Re: zak vs ringo
From: Rich <legalize@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:03:19 -0700
In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:39:36 -0500. <00b501c17092$b4709de0$6300a8c0@akrobiz.com>
Organization: multi-cellular, biological
Reply-To: thewho@igtc.com
Sender: owner-thewho@igtc.com

In article <00b501c17092$b4709de0$6300a8c0@akrobiz.com>,
    "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>  writes:

> Well, he was the first drummer in a Rock & Roll band to really get noticed.

Sure, but does that make him an innovative drummer, just because he
got noticed?

I'm not trying to say Ringo sucked.  I'm just questioning this idea
that he was innovative.

If we were talking about someone like Buddy Rich, I wouldn't think
twice about it.
--
Ask me about my upcoming book on Direct3D from Addison-Wesley!
  Direct3D Book <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
    Don't Support Spammers!  Boycott Fractal Painter 7!
     <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/spammers.html>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zak vs ringo
  - From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>

References:
- Re: zak vs ringo
  - From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Instant Party - Import CD Review
Next by Date: Re: Pshychoderelict, Quad on stage, Astley haters banquet
Prev by thread: Re: zak vs ringo
Next by thread: Re: zak vs ringo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread