"Is there anyone at home?"

[Gary Kellam <grkellam@mail.discover-net.net>]

AAAARRRGGHHH!!!!!!

To Steve M and anyone else who is too lazy, blind, or stupid to read
what I've written before they respond to it:

OK.  Last Time.  *PAY* *ATTENTION*:

I did *NOT* -- do you understand me -- *NOT* -- *NOT* -- *NOT* -- do you
understand?????? I did *NOT* complain about people who stand at
concerts.  Am I pleased about people who stand at concerts?  Do I think
they're considerate?  No.  But did I complain about them?  NO! Christ! 
I am getting so sick and tired of explaining this.  PAY ATTENTION!!  THE
ISSUE...I HAVE...IS WITH PEOPLE...WHO THINK...THAT I...SHOULD STAY
HOME...AND BUY...A VIDEOTAPE...BECAUSE...I DO NOT DESERVE...TO BE...AT A
WHO CONCERT...IF *I* DON'T...STAND.  If *I* don't stand.  If *I* don't
stand.  ARE YOU GETTING THIS?  DO YOU UNDERSTAND????????  SHOULD I TYPE
SLOWER?  Yesterday I actually spliced together only the most relevant
parts of the various posts I've sent to the list -- EXPRESSLY for the
purpose of preventing responses like yours.  If you are too lazy to read
what I've written, then please don't respond!

And to Lisa, who can't believe people are so passionate about the
sitting/standing issue:

It's nice for someone to put it all in perspective, and yes this whole
discussion has become ridiculous.  I can only speak for myself of
course, but at this point, as far as I'm concerned, the issue is no
longer about sitting vs. standing.  It's about stupidity vs.
intelligence. It's about people being too stupid or lazy to read a
person's post before responding to it.

Rhonda