"Rock and Roll: Social History"

Jim McW wrote about a book he hasn't read:
>One point of interest I've already noted is that Friedlander contends the
>Who's music is more intellectual that the Beatles's or the Stones's,
>while, at the same time, it was as loud and powerful as anyone else's.

        We knew that!  We did!  We did!
        Is he well-respected?  Think he can change some minds?

JenniferD
A Guitar          _________
\---\____________/         \
 :::=====================I  |
/---/            \_________/
(Courier font)
"The new Charles Atlas course, with DYNAMIC TENSION..."