RE: Worse living through chemistry

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

Chemistry is the key to success. Although the Celctics are a good example 
of poor chemistry, the Lakers are even a better one. They have a lot more 
depth than the C's and just can fit the right pieces together, and the Rice 
deal did not seem to help.



On Saturday, April 17, 1999 5:35 PM, R. Bentz Kirby [SMTP:bocelts@usit.net] 
wrote:
> In this ESPN article, the Celtics are picked to be an example of "bad"
> team chemistry.  Good players who don't play well together.
>
> http://espn.go.com/nba/programming/saturday/990417.html
>
>
> --
> Bentz
> bocelts@usit.net
>
> http://www.scsn.net/users/sclaw
>