[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Legality of Pete's research

Presumably Pete is saying that about the UK law (or its interpretation) changing since 1999 because he has been told this by legal counsel. I'm not impressed by the legal expert the Observer quotes, because anyone who is working in this field has a vested interest in being politically correct.

If anyone here is still writing letters about this, it might be interesting to inquire further into this issue of charging people retroactively. It definitely would be a miscarriage of justice if Pete carried out his research after being assured it was legal, and then was arrested after the law changed.


Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx