Legality of Pete's research

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Presumably Pete is saying that about the UK law (or its interpretation) 
changing since 1999 because he has been told this by legal counsel.   I'm 
not impressed by the legal expert the Observer quotes, because anyone who is 
working in this field has a vested interest in being politically correct.

If anyone here is still writing letters about this, it might be interesting 
to inquire further into this issue of charging people retroactively.  It 
definitely would be a miscarriage of justice if Pete carried out his 
research after being assured it was legal, and then was arrested after the 
law changed.

keets

_________________________________________________________________
Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House & Home.  
http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx