[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Breakin' the law!



>From: Peacemonger <bushchoked@yahoo.com>
>Subject: The thin thread of accusations
>
>Kevin:
>
>Under 16 would be pedophilia, would it not?

By US standards/law, it would indeed.
But, as I've said, U-taw is different.
Hey, some have multiple wives out there too!
Oh, and don't forget the "Jesus Jumpers"!

Hell, I could have gone to jail.
18 and dating an *almost* 17 yo.

"Breakin' the law....Breakin' the law!"

>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Re. gun-shy but willing to wield a torch
>
>>Is is me, or does it sound like Pete was keenly aware of the fine line,
>>and how to avoid legally tripping over it?

>I would say that his lawyer gave him very good advice about what to do and 
>what not to do.

My conclusions as well.

>After the investigation was underway, then I'm sure they were thinking
ahead 
>to what might happen.  Still, regardless of whether Pete has attempted to 
>cover his tracks, I believe what he says about his reasons for being on the

>site, and what his reactions were.  For one thing, he knew what he had done

>was illegal, and he apparently consulted with his lawyer right away.
That's 
>not something a pedophile would do.

You *know* I believe this as well.
It's the others I worry about.

Kevin in VT