I've got blisters on my.....penis!

["O'Neal, Kevin W." <Kevin.ONeal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	>From: Alan McKendree 
	>Subject: Re: uncircumcised 
>it's simple common sense: the more friction any body part encounters, the thicker the epidermis >will become. Guitarists equipped with fingertips can testify to that. It's true of hands, feet, >and anything else covered with skin.

Oh please.  Are you suggesting that circumcised men have calluses on their peckers?
Not.  You're sounding as militant on this issue as some of the "don't cut" web sites that are out there.
For those who never agonized with this decision (it's really the first and toughest choice you have to make *for* your son), there's a host of web sites out there that try to make you feel like a criminal for even *thinking* about circumcision.  Their tone turned me off pretty quick.  I was completely open minded, and not at all into the "I want him to be like me", or "it's my religion" arguments.  We waffled back and forth, and the thing that pushed us both was the smegma thing, but more importantly the "if you *do* eventually need to get circumcised, it is violently painful".  I dunno.  No one knows.  We'll never know.  It's all good.  

>daily friction

Boy Howdy!  I'm gaining a new found respect for you Alan!  Pictures of Lilly, or the real deal??  ;-)

Let me end my portion of participation in this thread by stating....
Even if true, I'd be willing to bet women *don't* want their men to have more sensitive penises.  :-)

Kevin in VT