Re: Here we go again...

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<sigh>  That's not very romantic, is it?  Here we have the difference 
between men's and women's imaginations.  Women aren't necessarily put off by 
the idea of gay sex.  For the male equivalent, consider two women together.  
Not that bad, huh?  If Roger's little gay movie weren't quite so violent, it 
would have crossed over.

One thing that did characterize the 60's/70's generation was the quest for 
experience.  As Pete has said before, many of his artistic role models back 
in those days were gay, and it's easy to figure that he wanted to understand 
their experience.  It makes him a broader writer, after all.  Also, Pete has 
always been much more attractive than he's thought.  I bet a lot of guys 
have made passes at him.  And so he's thinking, "I wonder what that would 
feel like?"

Until we get some further discussion from Pete, I guess we'll have to make 
do with imagination, but Fields definitely put a limit on what happened.

keets



> or two, and the mind boggles.  What do you suppose he's been up to?
> Threesomes?  Hmmm."
>
> I would assume that 'experiment' means something like...
> "What would that taste like?"
> "What would happen if I stuck this in there?"
> "What is the source of that smell?"
> etc.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com