[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New jetta opinion poll... GLX or Wolfsburg?
You make some good points Bill. From your perspective, I can see why the BMW
is a much better car. But the VW ain't no slouch either.
CBR929 as a "grocery getter"? Man, I'd hate to see what your meals are like
:)
See ya at the track...I'm off to Rausch Creek next.
Kevin Ng
97 Jetta GLX Windsor Blue
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hussey [SMTP:list_squid@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:19 PM
To: jettaglx@igtc.com
Subject: RE: New jetta opinion poll... GLX or Wolfsburg?
>From: "Ng, Kevin" <Kevin.Ng@bankofamerica.com>
>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:18:02 -0400
>
>Bill first of all it looks like you are comparing the Mk3 to the
E46.
>Understandable, since you are moving from one to the other. Of
course the
>BMW is going to be better. It's also nearly twice the price. I
would think
>that a Jetta is much better car than a Hyundai Accent. I would also
think
>that a Porsche 996 Turbo is a much better car than a BMW 3 series.
150%?
>200%? Who knows, can't really put a number on things like that. But
I will
>say that as far as the interior and the sound system, the Mk4 is
pretty
>darned close in quality to the E46.
Hell .. don't even take the E46, take the E30 ... my friend's '86
325e has a
stiffer chassis, better road manners, and more feel than my '98
Jetta.
>Ok let's talk performance. On paper, yes the BMW beats the Jetta in
every
>category. But why do you keep talking track? Don't get me wrong, I
love
>racing too. In fact I did some laps in my Jetta at Lime Rock just
this past
>Friday. But 99.99% of drivers don't go to the track 99.99% of the
time.
>Face
>it, production cars are designed for the street, and on the street
the
>performance margin between the 3 series and the Jetta is
negligible. Hell,
>even if you do wanna talk track, I bet I can take a Jetta to within
a
>second
>or two of a 3 series' lap times. And that sure ain't a 150%
difference :)
I mention the track because it's the safest place to explore the
limits and
true handling of a vehicle. I don't feel a true critique of a
vehicle can
be made without track time being involved. On any public road,
you're
always backing off at minimum a little bit ... you can't really PUSH
a car
on the street. That's not to say you can't have fun in a turn or
two ...
but you can't push hard enough to know what the car does when, for
example,
you life the inside rear wheel threshold braking up to the apex of a
corner
you just entered a tad hot ... or how predicatble the rear-end will
be when
you start exploring the accleratory traction limits exiting corners
under
full lateral load. On the track .. in most cases, a spin ends up
being
nothing more than a crack to the ego, maybe a dented fender or two
from a
tire wall. On the street, it's much worse. And it's those traits
of car,
the ability to be at the limit and beyond, yet still be in control,
that is
the essence of a rewarding driving experience.
Personally, I'm getting this car as a track car and occasional date
machine.
Everything else gets done by motorcycle. I've got a 2001 CBR929
that is
my daily commuter, my grocery getter, and my errand runner every day
out of
the year with the exception of the 5 or 10 days every winter that
Mother
Nature is actually able to accumulate snow on the ground here in the
NYC
are. In the last 3.5 years, I've put 95,000 miles on my
motorcycles, and
maybe 6,000 in a car ... most of that is traveling to CCA
events/auto-crosses and the actual track/parking-lot time itself ...
so yes,
track manners are VERY important to me.
>To me, both the Jetta and the 3 series are good cars for the money.
But
>even
>if I had the money I probably wouldn't buy a BMW. Why? Because,
like it or
>not, most BMW owners *are* snobbish and believe they are better
than
>everyone else. :P
So a few assholes buy BMWs and that means you shouldn't?? I know
plenty of
assholes that drive VW's ... you gonna sell your car now?
Personally, I
agree with the snobbish thing, but those are usually the same punks
who buy
it cause it's a "Luxury" car and have no idea what they actually
have ....
if it were up to me, you'd have to be able to turn predetermined lap
times
if you wanted to own a BMW .. even the X5.
>All that said, my next planned purchase will be a BMW, sort of: a
'02 Mini
>Cooper S. Let's see you take on that little bugger at the track :)
I went to the NY Auto Show at the Jacob Javitts center on Saturday
and saw
the Mini Cooper guys there. It's a great looking car. The
body/frame was
designed in a joint venture between Chrysler and BMW (if you look
close
enough, you can tell in what ways the Germans won the design
arguments, and
which ways the Americans won them). The engine is made by a british
company, whos name not only escapes me, but I've never heard of
before.
It's a shame really .. the interior is done up very well (Except for
the
locations of the dials, too cartoonish for me), then you open teh
engine bay
and it's very crappy looking. It's all black (which makes it look
dirty),
and the machining of the metals was done horribly, there are welds
visible
everywhere, wires hanging every which way, and it's a general
cluster-fart
in there ... definately doesn't belong in that car.
There had been rumors that BMW was pushing to have the driveline
power the
rear wheels, which wouldn't have been historically correct (the
original
Mini was FWD), but would've really turned the thing into a pocket
rocket.
The new one is in fact FWD, but looks cool anyway. The official
word is
2200 pounds, about the same as the new MR2, and 200 pounds less than
a
Miata, but I wonder if that's wet or dry weight which will make a
big
difference.
Bill
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com