Re: Stock springs oddity?

[Ricardo Higgins <rich@amcc.com>]

Wow I didn't know that. I prety much rue the day I lowered my 95. I
hit and scrape constantly. Too many bottom outs equates to much money.

Ric Higgins

Ng, Kevin (NationsCredit) wrote:
> 
> The '95 was an odd year for the GLX and GTI--soldered chip in ECU and higher
> suspension height come to mind. Has something to do with the spring perches
> I think. Just make sure if you plan to do a suspension swap keep in mind
> your car will be lowered about .5" more than advertised.
> 
> Kevin Ng
> 97 GLX Windsor Blue
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cyng [SMTP:cyng@lamere.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 1998 4:03 PM
> > To:   jettaglx@igtc.COM
> > Subject:      Stock springs oddity?
> >
> > Greetings.
> >    I guess I just noticed this, but the front end of my '95 GLX
> > sits higher than the rear. What I mean by this is that the clear-
> > ance between the tire and the wheelwell in the rear is about 2"
> > to 3", while it's a good 4" or more in the front. This is when
> > the car it at rest, with stock springs and shocks and wheels and
> > tires and so forth. Is yours this way? Should it be?
> >    Any thoughts?
> > -T
> >
> >           /=-                -=\----/=-                -=\
> >          /|     -=Thomas J. Boyer<cyng@lamere.net>=-     |\
> > O>///////|O>====================----====================<|O\\\\\\\<O
> >          \|      -=Tsaim Kurros<pen.mip.net 4000>=-      |/
> >           \=-                 -=woot=-                 -=/
> > .     .     .  q u e   h a y   s i n   m i   a m o r ? .     .     .