From: Kim <kimmalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: Kim <kimmalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Celtics@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: The Boston Celtics Mailing List Digest V11 #170 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:27:16 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
You can't trade the draft picks straight up for players, because of the cap. Maybe we'll be enough under the cap to take on someone worth having if Vin comes completely off our books prior to the draft, but that's a big maybe that requires multiple things to happen (note: don't forget that a buyout doesn't remove him from the cap, simply changed the money involved). And we still have to get offered someone worth taking on whatever baggage comes with them, as there will almost certainly be.
More likely they get packaged with some of what we've got to sweeten the deal so we can acquire an incrementally better player than the one we're dealing.
And no, if Ainge tries to do that even then, it might be because he thinks its the smartest thing to do, but that doesn't actually make it the smartest thing to do. I'll back most of his moves as making sense, but that's not the same as saying I think he's been faultless in what he's done.
Kim
-----Original Message----- From: Shawn Niles <shizzjr@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Apr 2, 2004 3:59 PM To: jozersky@xxxxxxxxxx, kimmalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Celtics@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: The Boston Celtics Mailing List Digest V11 #170
If Ainge trades the draft picks for players, it will not be because of public pressure to win. It will be because he knows that it is the smartest thing to do. One thing Ainge does not do is bow to pressure and make moves solely based on that.
>From: "Josh Ozersky" <jozersky@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Kim Malo" <kimmalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Celtics@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: The Boston Celtics Mailing List Digest V11 #170
>Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:44:42 -0500
>
>I agree completely. There is no way Ainge is thinking about taking
>on three developmental players. Not with the pressure on him to
>win next year. He's thinking about an impact veteran. He's doing
>what he can to be seen as into this draft, so that he can make a bargain,
>and make the right choice if a bargain doesn't offer itself. But no way
>is he going to stock the Celtics with more projects.
>
>Josh
>
> >And sorry, but another number 1 pick in a
> > draft deep in possibilites who will take years to payoff, but not in
>sure
> > things, doesn't thrill me. We've already got too many picks - adding
>that
> > many immature, underdeveloped players, no matter how talented, gets
>counter
> > productive after a certain point. They not only need development time of
> > their own to see if they will pan out, they affect everyone else's
>development.
> >
> > Kim
_________________________________________________________________
Free up your inbox with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Multiple plans available.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/