[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Devin Harris and Zydrunas Ilgauskas



Ooops,

I usually dont have my signature attached on emails to the list :) As for the college, not only do I teach there but I am also an alum :)

To this date, I have never seen the Blue Ghost though as a first and second grader we used to write him a letter every halloween...

wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Right-o, but he still played 30 a game; 31 this season.
Makes his production all the more impressive.
Also note, they were tanking last season.

But Stonehill College Visiting Instructor dude,
Here's a couple of Stonehill College Ghost stories for you.
Yes, free non-Basketball Bonus Coverage:

Stonehill College Ghost Stories
Background: Stonehill College opened on September 20, 1948, originally known as 'Stone Hill House', and was part of the estate of Frederick Ames, local Massachusetts aviator and stunt flyer, whose plane crashed into Tower Hill in Randolph on November 6, 1932, as he was performing stunts and a loose box in the plane shifted in the way of his control stick, killing him.


The estate of Frederick Ames was purchased by Holy Cross Fathers in 1935, and they used it as their eastern training headquarters for missionaries. Along the way,
the Holy Cross Fathers and brothers decided the estate was better suited for the
collegiate environment, and thus it was made so in 1948 with the formation of Stonehill College.

Ghosts of Stonehill: "The older story begins with a drowning that allegedly occurred in the indoor pool located in a building near rthe mansion when it was owned by the Ames family. When Stonehill College was created, they covered the pool and used the building as a gym. The draining of the pool hasn't stopped members of two generations of Stonehill students from reporting children's voices and a gruesome scratching sound coming from under the floor in the building, now Alumni Hall. A good story no doubt, but there was almost certainly no drowning in the old pool!

The other ghost story "tells of a dread Blue Mist that sweeps across the campus. Inside the Mist is the blood stained ghost of Fred Ames come to walk his estate again. The ghost story grew during one of the frequent expansions of Stonehill when new high powered outside lighting was installed in the late 1970's or early 1980's. These lights do seem to turn some of the frequent fogs that sweep through Easton an unusual shade of blue!"




For most, if not all, of last year Cleveland was really limiting his
minutes to protect the foot.


Sean Giovanello
Visiting Instructor
Department of Political Science
Stonehill College
North Easton, MA 02357
(508) 565-1283












-----Original Message-----From: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:35 PM To: celtics@xxxxxxxx Subject: re: RE: Devin Harris and Zydrunas Ilgauskas

Ilgauskas has missed 1 game in two season. He seems quite healthy
and is an upgrade over Perkins. And Cleveland sans injury to McGinnis
was going to be in the playoffs and still may be. Ilgauskas scores,
rebounds, and blocks shots, what more do you want?
Ray





Marcus may or may not be the point guard of the future. I don't think


he


is. Some do. We'll see. But at best, the jury is still out. If you can
get a better player, you have to do it. Point guard is crucial. We


have


Chucky to handle things for two more seasons, but we have to find the
long-term answer (and maybe short-term -- as good as Chucky has been,


we


have to be open to upgrades).

The only position the Celts don't need to address in the draft is the
2/3 spot. If they can get an impact player at PF/C or PG, do it.

As for Ray's interest in Ilgauskas ... Yes, he has played 71 games


this


season. Bill Walton played an entire season in 1986. Didn't mean he


had


good feet or wasn't injury prone.

Look, if you can get Ilgauskas without giving up Perkins, maybe. But
then it's going to cost you Jiri -- and I'm not in favor of that.
Ilgauskas puts up decent stats, but he hasn't been the impact player
that he used to be. He has lost some quickness and just isn't the same
guy. Before all the injuries, he was a center who made you a playoff
team -- look back at the records. Since the injuries, he's a decent
center in a center-starved conference.


Yes to a PG in the draft, no to Ilgauskas.

Mark

-----Original Message-----From: Sean Giovanello


[mailto:sgiovanello@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:06 AM
To: Berry, Mark S; Celtics@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Devin Harris and Zydrunas Ilgauskas

I just think its to early to even be considering drafting a PG. We
just took Marcus this past year and Danny obviously liked him. He
talked him up big time as well (the most NBA ready point guard in the
draft - oops). Even Danny's critics agree he has an average to above
average eye for talent. Given all this, why are we basically giving


up


on Banks after a season that has seen the team be blown up twice, a
coaching change, uneven playing time, and so forth.


We added Chucky to mentor him as well. Thus, we have a veteran to


help


bring him along in the coming months and years. To me, on a team with


a


lot of holes, this looks like one position we should be set at for at
least the coming year (then we will have a better sense about Banks).

Arguably, we are set at PG (Banks, Atkins) SG (Jiri, Davis) SF (Pierce


-


please put him here Danny - and Jiri). This leaves PF and C as the
places we should be targetting for next year. Its one thing to take a
project at the 2 or 3, but is it really worth drafting a project or


any


other type of PG this year?

Sean Giovanello
Visiting Instructor
Department of Political Science
Stonehill College
North Easton, MA 02357
(508) 565-1283












-----Original Message-----From: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx


[mailto:owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf


Of Berry, Mark S
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:41 AM
To: Celtics@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Devin Harris and Zydrunas Ilgauskas

On a couple of recent Ray posts:



The Celts love Devin Harris ... I like him, too. Someone compared him


to


Gilbert Arenas and I think that's a pretty good comparison. He's
definitely an offensive-minded point guard, but the key is he's a


point


guard. He plays point guard for Wisconsin. He's not a shooting guard


who


would be switched to point guard (hello, Ben Gordon).



Is he my ideal Celtic point guard? No. But I think he'll be a good NBA
player. He has a lot of "stuff." He can shoot, but he also can get to
the rim, has a great mid-range game, knows how to use the glass, and


he


sees the floor. I like him. He's not Jason Kidd, but those guys don't
come along that often. I think he's a better player than Marcus Banks.



On another draft note ... does anyone know if the Hoop Summit game


will


be broadcast this weekend?



Zydrunas Ilgauskas ... No thanks. Not if it means parting with


Kendrick


Perkins. You don't trade a young center with Kendrick's upside for an
aging, seriously injury-prone former all-star who is a shadow of the
player he once was. Ilgauskas was a great player before the injuries.
Now he's a good player. Nothing more. Stay away.



This and that:



.... Danny tells Tommy he wants to see more of Marcus, Mihm and Hunter
and the same night Walter gets 46 minutes. Then, when Carroll sees
that's crazy, he plays Jumaine Jones instead of Hunter. Carroll knows
he's out of here, so he's not paying a lick of attention to anything
Ainge says. I don't really think it makes much of a difference at this
point (the ship has sailed), but it has to make Ainge simmer when
Carroll pulls this stuff.



.... Danny talking about all the point guards in this draft. I don't
think he's sold on Banks either. Good. He shouldn't be.



.... Did anyone have any thoughts on Okafor's performance Saturday? He
took over that game with four or five blocks in the first 10 minutes.
Just changed the way it was going to be played. Dwight Howard may be
great, but if he went to college and stuck around for three years,
wouldn't any coach in America be THRILLED if he turned out to be as


good


as Emeka Okafor? How much better than Okafor could he be? And with
Okafor, you know you're getting a strong work ethic, a leader and a
team-first guy. If I were a GM with the top pick, I wouldn't think
twice. No way I'd take Howard over Okafor. No way.



Mark


** --------- End Original Message ----------- **






** --------- End Original Message ----------- **