RE: Pierce And Mihm Refute Rick D's Rebounding Assertion

[wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

But that still leaves Pierce.  And while Harter's system may 
not be beneficial to rebounders, the major problem is  Blount 
and McCarty playing heavy minutes. Somehow, a young Dennis 
Rodman or any other fine rebounder would be rebounding at an 
adequate rate methinks. Harter's system or not, if you substituted  
Perkins and Hunter for McCarty and Blount, I can't imagine them 
do as poor a job at rebounding.
Ray


> ** Original Subject: RE: Pierce And Mihm Refute Rick D's  Rebounding Assertion
> ** Original Sender: "R. Singh" <keltsfan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ** Original Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:02:34 -0800 (PST)


> Actually, if you compare Mihm's rebounding numbers to when he was with
> Cleveland, they are down significantly in roughly the same number of
> minutes. And Tony Battie's rebounding numbers are up as are Antoine
> Walker's. 
> 
> The Celtics weak rebounding is more systemic than anything else, in my
> opinion.
> 
> Ravi
> 
> -----Original Message-----From: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 6:07 AM
> To: celtics@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Pierce And Mihm Refute Rick D's Rebounding Assertion
> 
> 
> Pierce and Mihm seem to rebound well under the Harter System. Sorry, but
> plain and simple, Waltaaah and Blount are suckie boarders. Especially
> Walter. Play those two bench guys, 40 minutes a game, and entropy sets
> in a big way. Ray

>** --------- End Original Message ----------- **