[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Baker on ESPN last night



To me, that's an interesting "grey area".  If I were the paranoid sort, I 
might wonder if Dr. Baccus had an "understanding" with anyone not to 
certify Baker no matter what.  After all, how much motive can 30+ million 
dollars be these days?

Before the anti-conspiracy theorists go up in flames, I'm just indulging in 
wild speculation here, ok?

At 02:04 PM 2/25/2004, Eggcentric@xxxxxxx wrote:

>In a message dated 2/25/04 6:28:43 PM, jahill199@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< I thought that it was that he was
>
>out a total of 10 games in a row, based on the doctor not allowing him to
>
>play, that is the agreement.  Not a night here or there based on the Celtics
>
>opinion of his poor play.
>
>  >>
>
>Lots of grey area here.  Doctor Baccus, for Baker's convenience,
>assigned a local Dr. to physically check Baker periodically.  I understand
>that local doctor approved Baker's fitness to return.  But somehow,
>Baccus did not.
>
>Egg

Snoopy the Celtics Beagle
Please visit the <http://www.celticsbeagle.net/>Celtics Beagle Website