[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Baker on ESPN last night
To me, that's an interesting "grey area". If I were the paranoid sort, I
might wonder if Dr. Baccus had an "understanding" with anyone not to
certify Baker no matter what. After all, how much motive can 30+ million
dollars be these days?
Before the anti-conspiracy theorists go up in flames, I'm just indulging in
wild speculation here, ok?
At 02:04 PM 2/25/2004, Eggcentric@xxxxxxx wrote:
>In a message dated 2/25/04 6:28:43 PM, jahill199@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< I thought that it was that he was
>
>out a total of 10 games in a row, based on the doctor not allowing him to
>
>play, that is the agreement. Not a night here or there based on the Celtics
>
>opinion of his poor play.
>
> >>
>
>Lots of grey area here. Doctor Baccus, for Baker's convenience,
>assigned a local Dr. to physically check Baker periodically. I understand
>that local doctor approved Baker's fitness to return. But somehow,
>Baccus did not.
>
>Egg
Snoopy the Celtics Beagle
Please visit the <http://www.celticsbeagle.net/>Celtics Beagle Website