Re: The Kobe case

["Greg Odegaard" <grodeg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

My point still remains, that even though I can probably deal with the
friendly banter about the case, there is no way we need to have the gory
details that were posted in the original pasted article.  Even if our kids
didn't read that email do the rest of us really need to be subjected to the
apparent "tearing" that could have happened after the girls alleged 3rd act
in 3 days?

For those that didn't get that news, this is the depth the news stooped late
last week and I for one don't care to read about here. I think even Ray
admitted he did wrong, so free speech and 40 emails debating the matter or
not, it doesn't belong here.  Come on Tam even you can't argue for more
details on vaginal tearing can you?  This is what you and Dan are supporting
by your emails, whether you know it or not.

IF we want these details fine, then I for one can email you all directly
daily, giving you ever blow during every day of the upcoming month long
trial.

Frankly I am shocked by the those who haven't spoken up.  Your silence is
quiet endorsement in my eyes.  Simple as that, so maybe we do need 100 more
emails in the next 24 hours on the topic.  The really loud majority needs to
make their case now.

Argue for something that makes sense next time.

Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: <Tammo29@xxxxxxx>
To: <celtics@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:40 PM
Subject: The Kobe case


> We have one post on the Kobe case and eighteen posts on whether or not
it's a
> waste of space.  Doesn't that seem a bit ironic?
>
> I'd be the last person on this list to tell anyone what to do, but perhaps
we
> could all just post things we felt relevant, just read what we wanted to
> read, and skip over what we don't instead of arguing over it?  Makes sense
to me.
>
>
> TAM