Re: What About Wells?

["Jaims Castillo" <jaimscastillo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wells and Dale Davis...I'd consider.  Seems like rebounding is a large concern
now obviously.

McInnis will be like a Mike James already so we might not actually need to get
him.

Just my thoughts...



  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bos3332@xxxxxxx
  To: celtics@xxxxxxxx
  Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:59 AM
  Subject: What About Wells?


  What about rading for Wells, seems to be having problems in Portlnad. We
  trade Battie and Williams for Wells and McInnis. Gives us 3ed scorer and
depth at
  PG. We move Pierce to SF and Wells at SG. Gives Protland some depth at C/PF
in
  case they move Rasheed. What you guys think of this.-Tony



  Portland trades: PG Jeff McInnis(10.8 ppg, 1.5 rpg, 4.2 apg in 25.6 minutes)
   SG Bonzi Wells(14.0 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 3.1 apg in 35.0 minutes)
  Portland receives: C Tony Battie(5.9 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 1.1 apg in 20.7 minutes)
   SF Eric Williams(12.7 ppg, 4.9 rpg, 0.6 apg in 23.0 minutes)
  Change in team outlook: -6.2 ppg, +3.2 rpg, and -5.6 apg.

  Boston trades: C Tony Battie(5.9 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 1.1 apg in 20.7 minutes)
   SF Eric Williams(12.7 ppg, 4.9 rpg, 0.6 apg in 23.0 minutes)
  Boston receives: PG Jeff McInnis(10.8 ppg, 1.5 rpg, 4.2 apg in 10 games)
   SG Bonzi Wells(14.0 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 3.1 apg in 10 games)
  Change in team outlook: +6.2 ppg, -3.2 rpg, and +5.6 apg.

  TRADE ACCEPTED
  Due to Portland and Boston being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is
invoked.
  Portland and Boston had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary
  given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade
  satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.



  You have been assigned Trade ID number 1297147