"The Paul Pierce show was killing the offense. "-DJessen

[JB <jimmetz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 18, 2003, at 1:14 AM, ojai_ramos wrote:

> Awful. When it all started slipping away I actually felt physically
> ill. How many lost games can we directly attribute to PP not playing
> well? Awful.
>
> 	Ojai
************
	I wouldn't mind if he was not "playing well." What I do mind, is a
ball hog, looking for personal stats/glory, at the expense of losing
games.
	I don't like it from Iverson, I didn't like it from Walker and I don't
like it from Pierce. If you are on the way to a 6-20 night, in a season
of poor shooting performances, you don't look to keep on chucking in a
close contest like last night.
	Perhaps the worst aspect of Paul's performance last night were his
quotes in the paper this AM:

     ``That's a tough loss to swallow,'' said Pierce, who had just six
of his 17 points in the second half. ``We let them jump over us, get
offensive rebounds, get second and third opportunities, and it cost us
the game. We didn't come out with the same hunger like we did in the
first half.'' -Steve Bulpet

"That's a tough loss to swallow," said Pierce. "I told [my teammates]
this is a team that could easily be a .500 team. They've lost a lot of
close ballgames. They're not going to lay down. They're going to get in
and fight in the third quarter. We let them jump all over us [in the
second half], get offensive rebounds, get second and third
opportunities, and it cost us the game. We didn't come out with the
same hunger in the second half that we had in the first half." -Shira
Springer

	Is that the sign of a leader?
	Whey your team is down by twenty, I can see letting a Pierce just try
to go off and lead a comeback, but on a night when so many other
sources of offense were clicking, it's a shame to let everything break
down and watch the lead fritter away.


  JB
*********************

	The Paul Pierce show was killing the offense. Tell-tale sign that the
Paul Pierce show was about to commence was Banks taking a shot with
about 7 seconds left on the clock after playing a great game and
previously constanstly forcing the Knicks to get back on defense. On
the other end, PP gets the rebound, looks toward Banks who is clapping
his hands together to receive the ball and ram it up the court, but PP
blows him off, brings it up himself and the PP show is on. Repeated
forces, two guys draped all-over him, it didn't matter. It would have
been great theater but PP wasn't hitting anything. The thing was that
Obie also took out Banks after that play. It was like he was confirming
that the PP show was to commence. Paul never looked to pass when he
came back in the fourth quarter. He was trying to do it all himself. He
was horrible. He has got a lot to learn (or unlearn) about playing the
passing game....
Otherwise, nice growth game for all up-and-comers: Baker, Welch and
Banks.....
I like the combination of Banks, Kedrick and Welch together....
Battie came down to earth. Celtics should not continue to look to as an
offensive weapon, nor should he......
I would prefer that the Cs win but this game was a good growth spurt
for the long term.....

DJessen33
___________

	I don't know DJ, I'm starting to worry about divisiveness and anger
towards Pierce, from the soldiers that are used  to picking up the
pieces for him, while letting him get all the credit.
	Any role player, or sideman, as they say in the music business is
often happy letting the front man take the attention and the glory, but
only when they are winning/making money. When they are losing/fading
and the the aging crooner starts blaming the drummer and/or the bassist
for the sagging ticket sales, the situation often goes  downhill from
there.
	Not wanting to become like the proverbial general, who looks behind
him, in battle and realizes his troops have gone on bivouac, Paul had
better start to take his captaincy seriously and work long, extra
hours, on his shooting and also sincerely finding a way to fit into the
offense, rather than insist that it "run through him," whenever he has
the whim.
	JB
**************
How much longer is the enabling going to continue where every loss is
always O'Brien's fault and never the fault of any player(s)?
           

CeltsSteve
________
	There was much good ball movement and easy lay ups when Pierce was on
the bench. If Pierce doesn't have the sense to play within the offense
in those situations, than O'Brien has to pull him. I'll blame them
both, for sabotaging the concept of team play and movement offense.
	I also wonder, with Banks and Welsch playing well, why we had to watch
Mike James shoot 1-9 from three point land? You can't blame Paul for
that can you?
	JB
Unchain My Heart!