RE: Celtics games week of Nov 2-8, 2003

[Snoopy the Celtics Beagle <snoopy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Don't worry, I have no intention of stopping the CBW reviews.  Nothing 
Shawn says will be able to prevent it.  Only the listowner can prevent me 
from posting them here, and even should such an unlikely event occur, 
they'll still be available on the CBW itself.

Hang in there, like the "Mary Ellen Carter".

At 03:23 PM 11/3/03 -0400, you wrote:

>All I ask is that you sit down...take an aspirin...and keep the damn game 
>summaries coming.  I am temporarily without my Directv, so pardon me for 
>being a little snarkey at the moment.  But I read your summaries, every 
>word of them...and I agree with whomever it was in saying that the content 
>is far more than the writeups in both daily Boston papers.
>
>I don't know the real genesis to the Snoopy/Shawn feud, but please keep 
>posting the summaries...at least until I am able to see the games again on 
>a regular basis.
>
>Cecil
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Snoopy the Celtics Beagle [mailto:snoopy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: November 03, 2003 3:14 PM
>To: Celtics@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Celtics games week of Nov 2-8, 2003
>
>
>Except for the fact that I've never threatened you.
>
>And you--and certain others like you--are the REASON I don't advertise my
>real name.  In the past, I HAVE been threatened, I have been harassed, and
>I decided to take steps to put an end to that.
>
>There's nothing that separates me from any other Celtics fan.  I claim no
>special knowledge, no professional association, and have met one or two
>Celtics players in the same way as any fan--either at a game, or by chance
>on the street.  My opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's in
>general.
>
>I express it and people are free to agree, disagree, or ignore it as they
>please.  But they are not free to--let me see, what was your EXACT QUOTE?
>
>Oh yes: "What he cannot do is hurl insults at other list members and
>constantly come up with cute ways to put them down."
>
>Your own words, Shawn.  Not mine, not anyone else's.  Time to either live
>up to your professed ideals or stop betraying them.
>
>If I choose to use an obviously assumed name online, that's my
>decision.  If you dislike that idea, then simply reset your filters and
>move on.  You don't have to read, much less respond, to my posts.  if you
>choose to do otherwise, then that's a problem--but it's YOUR problem, NOT 
>mine.
>
>That goes for anyone else who has a problem with my choice of names or the
>subjects of my posts.
>
>At 01:34 PM 11/3/03 -0500, Shawn Niles wrote:
>
> >I was talking specifically about Snoopy. You have used your name numerous
> >times in the past and have even given personal information. You've shown
> >you have nothing to hide.
> >
> >People like snoopy, however, do not use their real names. However, they
> >feel comfortable psong threats because they know that no one knows their
> >real name. It's real easy to be tough when no one knows who you are.
> >
> >And as for why I don't use Shawn in my e-mail addy... it was taken. So I
> >chose one of my nicknames. However, you'll notice my display name is still
> >my real name.
> >
> >
> >>From: Eggcentric@xxxxxxx
> >>To: shizzjr@xxxxxxxxxxx, Celtics@xxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: Celtics games week of Nov 2-8, 2003
> >>Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:20:38 EST
> >>
> >>< FWIW, Shizz is only used as my e-mail address. My name is Shawn.
> >>I don't feel the need to hide behind an alias. > - SHAWN
> >>
> >>So why not just use Shawn as your screen name instead of Shizz?
> >>
> >>I respond to the screen names of Tyler, GuyClinch, CallMeBogie, Grodeg,
> >>etc., not Gene, Pete, Mike, Greg.  I do not need to know Tammo, or
> >>Lapdoggy, and Snoopy's birth names to enjoy their posts.
> >>
> >>Are you saying that it would really make a difference if I signed my
> >>posts as Brenda rather than Egg?  Talk about a non-issue.
> >>
> >>Egg

Snoopy the Celtics Beagle
Please visit the <http://www.celticsbeagle.net/>Celtics Beagle Website