[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Roy, Here's Why You Take Pavlovic At 16 Instead Of Collison
- To: <celtics@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Roy, Here's Why You Take Pavlovic At 16 Instead Of Collison
- From: "Enrile, Roy" <renrile@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:41:00 -0700
- Sender: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcMvUofHEtS72k+RQz6srUB74LVC+AAIwe5g
- Thread-topic: Roy, Here's Why You Take Pavlovic At 16 Instead Of Collison
Sure, that's logical. I'd personally still take Collison, the cap hit,
and the PF conflict, because I'm a fan of post play(1980's).
Collison, Hayes, and (Steve Blake or Brett Nelson as a freeagent) would
be a nice talent infusion of older rookies.
The espn scenario should turn out well too, so the C's are in good
position. I'm glad we beat out Phoenix/Atlanta with those coin tosses
so we didn't end up with pick 17 and 21.
-----Original Message-----
From: Way Of The Ray [mailto:wayray@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:18 AM
To: celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Roy, Here's Why You Take Pavlovic At 16 Instead Of Collison
Pavlovic = Fills need, can be a star, can be stashed in Europe
next season saving cap space, won't be avaialble at 20.
VS.
Collison - May fill a need, when Walker is dealt/leaves, can be a solid
player,
cap burden, and looks like he'll be available at 20.
Ray