[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brandon Hunter...Egg response
Egg wrote:
> Pete - I am not sure which of us is the most ''stupid'' - you for singing
> such an optimistic tune, or me for feeling the necessity to turn off
> the radio.
What optomistic tune?
I got my measurements from the NBA predraft camp. The guy is 6' 7.75"
That's 6'8" NBA style.
Note this paragraph below...
>
> < Your selling the guy short.. He is 6.6.5" without shoes according the
> Chicago predraft. That means he is 6'8" in shoes..(the always round up in
> the NBA). The guy also has a great wingspan and good standing reach.
> Those stats are way more important then height.> - Pete
Your selling him short..
In otherwords he is taller then 6'6"..and has the length sufficent to play
the position.
>
> Have you actually seen Hunter play? Are you familiar with his
> warts, or are you automatically taking the role of Celt loyalist?
I didn't make any comment about Hunter's future..
>
> Apples to oranges. Brand was drafted #1, Marion at #9. Hunter was
> drafted at #56. How do you account for that?
>
I guess my whole post was lost on you..
Again..I was commenting that he wasn't too short to play the spot. <g>
That's all..nothing else. It was a simple straightforward post.
Read this paragraph again:
>
> < The guy is certainly big enough to play the PF if Walker is. I wouldn't be
>
> surpised he actually had a longer standing reach then Walker who plays
> shorter then he is, IMHO > - Pete
>
> Now I am really on a roll. Do you actually feel that Hunter, due to his
> superior standing reach, has as good a shot as Walker to make the NBA?
Your on a roll?! Hmm. Its pretty easy to debate people..if your making up the
things that they are saying. Heh.
I never compared him to Barkley in talent level. I meant what I said..that
Hunter is tall and long enough to play the position, and shouldn't be written
of as too short. Get it? <g>
>
> < Also with his hops..(I heard 38 wow) he could slot behind K. Brown to give
>
> us plus rebounding at that position and compensate for Walker's minus
> rebounding.> - Pete
>
> OK - 38 is impressive - but according to your above statement, you see
> Hunter as neither a PF nor impressive enough to even surge ahead of poor
> Kedrick on our SF depth chart.
I said could. It depends if he can play or not. <g>
Let me remind what I wrote before:
>
> < Now it could turn out that he can't play...and this whole debate will be
moot. > -Pete
> Barkley was one terrific player no matter what you wish his height
> to be with or without shoes, reinforced peds, lifts, padded socks, or
> stilts. Talent-wise, do you feel Hunter has Barkley potential? Dumb
> as you may feel this thinking to be - Hunter will never make our team
> due to the combination of roster limitations/Hunter limitations.
>
Umm no. I think it would be dumb to write him off as too short.
Isn't that what he said? <g> It would be a pleasant surpise if he makes the
team, as most second rounders statistically do not. However <again> its dumb to
write him off as too short.
See what I wrote before:
> <Its a mistake to write this guy off because he is "too short". If he can
> do the things on the court..that is what matters. AI is like 5'10"..and he
> can play shooting guard. > - Pete
>
> Even in 2nd-rate orchards there are always a certain amount of good
> pluckins to eat despite the many more that are left to rot upon the ground.
>
> So fine - make your case for Hunter by citing the two best examples of
> extraordinary players who have broken through the ''too short'' barrier.
> And let Tyler cite untasted juicy fruit like Ginobili as being the exception
>
> to the ''left to rot upon the ground'' rule at #57. Name one other #57
> who has made the cut. <Egg>
I am not making any case. I was stating that other smaller players have done
well.
So Brandon might make it. That's why we umm drafted him.
Kindly respond to what I am writing next time..
Rather then going on a "roll" and defeating some fictional adversary in the
world of sports mailings lists.
Pete