Re: Another Wallace special

[Kestutis.Kveraga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kestutis Kveraga)]

--- You wrote:
Shammond Williams remained a player who had the potential to come into any
game and pour in a quick 20 points. Was he consistent? No. Was he a guy we'd
resign after this season? I hope not. But for the remainder of this season,
he provided you with a sometimes explosive shooter and emergency point guard
off the bench. Is there any scenario where we can see Blount having that
kind of impact? Grant Long is worlds better than Blount isn't he? 

What a bunch of morons.
--- end of quote ---

Look at it this way, Mark: it moves Baker to 5th on the center depth chart,
sixth if they don't put Bryant on the IR. That's a good thing. More
importantly, it should be yet another nail in Wallace's professional coffin, if
the ownership is not asleep at the wheel.   
Heck, Blount at least tries hard, as inept as he is, blocks the occasional shot
or two, and sometimes can even catch and dunk the ball. At one point he was
also nailing a baseline J with some consistency. If Battie, McCarty, and Long
are unavailable for some reason, I want Blount in there instead of Baker. At
least it's honest physical effort, not the fake, bullshit "effort" you get from
Vinnie. 

To summarize, the positives are:
1) Wallace may be closer to moving back to his parents' basement in WV;
2)  we got a couple of warm big bodies, and you can always use a big body in
the NBA, unless it's Vinnie Baker's. We now have 7 guys 6-9 or taller, which
hasn't been the case in more than a decade. But two of them are completely
useless, so it's more like 4 or 5, depending on Bryant's situation. 

The negatives are:
1) we got screwed again in terms of talent. 
2) we lost a 2nd rounder, which, while always wasted by the BDT, in competent
hands can fetch useful players.  

A negative that may turn into a positive:
1) Vinnie lost a shoulder to cry on and may become totally discombobulated and
retire. Is Obie being a little clever here? 

Kestas