[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: article and the SG situation

To: celtics@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: article and the SG situation
From: Kestas <kkv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:37:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <001401c2d3c4$e653af50$0d81c318@celtics1>
References: <10434027@newdasher.Dartmouth.EDU>
Sender: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx

At 08:03 PM 2/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:

Like because at this point in his career he is still even below project
status. What makes one think he will change tonite? Why would OB, even OB
start him?

So, what status is below project status? Why woud a player who can play defense and rebound be considered "below project status"? And why - short of a season-ending injury to Walker and/or Pierce - would the management think the season is over at this point, regardless of who starts?

Kestas

References:
- Re: article and the SG situation
  - From: Kestutis Kveraga
- Re: article and the SG situation
  - From: Dan Forant

Prev by Date: Re: You're not going to believe this
Next by Date: Olympics
Previous by thread: Re: article and the SG situation
Next by thread: Re: article and the SG situation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread