RE: Vin Baker

["Wright, Cecil" <Cecil.Wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No offense Mark, but what is the purpose of bringing this up?  We know the Baker trade isn't working and we know that Wallace gambled and lost.  We know all this.  If it is just venting and frustration, okay then.

I saw some excellent teamwork last night and was very impressed at their willingness to move the ball to the open man.  Like it or not we are going to shoot the 3 at an abnormal rate.  Obie has rolled the dice also in this respect, obviously figuring that between Delk, Pierce, Walker, Bremer, Shammond and Waltah, they may hit 40% of them.  For the most part, our inside game is virtually nonexistent, save for alleyoops last night to Battie, so I can see why the coaching staff feels the need for the outside game, especially Conner who was a long range bomber himself.  I still would rather see us try to pound the ball inside.  That is my preference.  But I don't coach this team.

Cecil  

-----Original Message-----
From: Berry, Mark S [mailto:berrym@BATTELLE.ORG]
Sent: February 06, 2003 9:49 AM
To: 'celtics@igtc.com'
Subject: Vin Baker


Lots of good stuff in the Globe and Herald today, including the first really
critical, on-target criticism yet of Chris Wallace (by Peter May).
Apparently at some point, things become so obvious you can't avoid them any
longer.

I'm going to talk about Baker because he overshadows the game last night
(nice win, though). Do you see now why O'Brien didn't make him any more of a
focal point than he did? Do you see why he made Vin a bit player? The minute
you start to rely on Vin Baker, you're finished. I'm disgusted with the guy.
Apparently there was speculation yesterday that Baker was contemplating
retirement. We should be so lucky. We're stuck with this embarrassment for
three more years after this. There is no trade out there. There is no
contract that is worse. There is nothing to do. At this point, I'm hoping
they remove him from the rotation completely and actively encourage him to
retire. Maybe that's harsh, but the guy is stealing money.

The only person I'm more disgusted with is Wallace, of course. Baker is here
only because Wallace brought him here. Wallace made that choice. It's really
mind-boggling. I honestly can't remember a dumber trade in the history of
sports. What a disaster. He has condemned the Celtics to the worst fate you
can suffer in the NBA-mediocrity. They're good enough to make the playoffs,
but we all know they're not good enough to win a championship. They've been
lapped by the Nets and Pacers, and other teams in the East are closing the
gap. There won't be anymore high draft picks. There's no cap room. What you
see is what you get. Get used to 45 wins and early playoff exits. Maybe
that's enough for some fans, who were so tired of the years of losing. But
it's not enough. Not for the Boston Celtics. They play for championships.

It takes the fun out of games like last night. You can enjoy them for what
they are, but you always know how this ultimately is going to end.

Mark