[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Antoine



At 09:47 AM 4/25/2003 -0400, Berry, Mark  S wrote:
I really can't believe how bad Isiah is. Can't he see how defending Antoine
with Reggie Miller and Ron Mercer is a disaster?
It's the same man who can't find PT for tough defender Strick over half crippled Hardaway though, so no I don't think he can.

 Kim made the point
yesterday that it's better than the other options-Pierce or EWill. I
completely disagree.
Got me confused with someone else maybe? Not a biggie, but it might confuse anyone trying to figure out what was said in which post. Now if I hadn't already deleted the posts, it might be instructive to see who you confuse me with.... ; P

 If you're coaching against the Celtics, who would you
rather see with the ball in the low post-Walker, Pierce or EWill? My
preference would be EWill. He's not especially efficient down there, he's
not a good free throw shooter and, most importantly, he's not a real threat
as a passer. Basically, if the ball is in his hands, it's not in Pierce's or
Walker's. The one thing I don't want to do if I'm Indy, is encourage Antoine
to post up and attack the basket, where I'm forced to double team him
because he's abusing a smaller defender. Stick O'Neal on Antoine and Toine
will struggle and start to hoist up threes. That's what you want if you're
Indy, isn't it?
Although I don't totally agree with you here. EWill is one of the best on this team at drawing fouls and still has a relatively quick first step. They've won every game where he's had a significant contribution to the offense. While not having the ball in Pierce or Walker's hands all the time is a good thing - makes us less predictable to defend and leads to better all around ball movement. I'd still prefer to have Antoine on the low post, but don't see EWill there as the disaster you do. While Pierce is too prone to turnovers while dribbling for me to be happy playing him there in traffic vs having him slash and drive in from the wing.

That means continued bad
coaching, bad drafting and bad decisions across the board. Two blown picks
that will rot on the bench, a too-rich contract extension for Antoine and
continued mediocrity.
Nope, don't think it does, because I think Wallace is history regardless. And be careful what you wish for, because change doesn't equate with progress anyway

Kim